http://www.isitfunnytoday.com/
People talk about uuber-beautiful girls being out of my league. I'd hit on one. Elyse was that and we were engaged. That was nice.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081203155309AA2DyM3
If a vagina isn't used can it heal up and close?
We're the first generation born after women's liberation. We're different.
http://basicinstructions.net/?p=809
People need to learn how to have these conversations. Irregularity occurs and you've got to be able to deal with that or you're not socially prepared and you'll drop that potato. You've got to handle that responsibility. It's data coming right at you. Do not fail.
The flip of that is probably -9.
My #B is caught in some kind of xom -9 function. That is not my intention, nor is it good. It's probably complicated by a 3 > 4 and by the lack of a plotted course for the #2. But 2 < 10 is true, and 3 > 4 does not impede that, and a portion of it is party to that.
That is a neat trap but the malice behind it is offensive. +-8 < 10 to numerous of the Celts' ultimate destination. That function does not guarantee the chance to do it to me as well.
"I wasn't aware that the vagina was an injury."
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081203155309AA2DyM3
This one has me rolling!
It's an emotional injury, really.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081203184643.htm
Sickle cell cured! We're going to have to reconcile GM crops and DNA therapy. One is creating new species into an ecology, one is aiding existing species in the same ecology. DNA therapy to give me better hair to reproduce more fully, or to make me taller is GM. Sickle cell cures are not GM.
And the virus that introduces those genes, it is playing off of a function where it expects its genes to be unique from a host's desire and propagate. That concept is defeated, almsot assuredly but for hz, during gene therapy. That is folding back the helper virus, theoretically. What is it gaining?
I see a lot of 'stalks' going around. The question is why. Those are not 1.0bar. Are they corrective in nature? They are all for YH's -Y, which does not lead to 1.0, does it? It's a very roundabout way to get to 1.0 if it is. Show me how. Also, I suspect it's not just a corrective measure, and if it is, it's not 1.0bar, it's only 1.2 < 10.
===
What happened while I slept? I suspect it's a 7 > 10 error. 10 > 7 = 1. 7 > 10 = 0. That is probably a ~100 year old desire for justice to be done, but it being not done. Do I want justice more than truth? No. When did I ask for that? 33? I believe not. What would I have revalued that justice as, only to place truth above it? And there is still a tiny crack on the closer side. So we're looking at a different victory.
:8 of all voodoo dolls? < 10.
This guy got really psychic with the salvia. It was good. But then this kind of #P twining thing happened and it should not have. To be as easily defended from that kind of thing by a 10 > 9 appropriate separation is good. He said my name at one point. I told him about what the guys in Mumbai didn't know. We're all unique. What is the opposite of unique? There is none, if you look closely. Actually, it is itself. Technically, it is. In a #10, there are both a thing and its reciprocal covered, and their separation.
Wonderful. Now his highness energies are hanging out around me. They're very 'low 2'. Or something changes in the eyes. I wonder why. /1. They've got a black and red vibrational structure that is like the middle three fingers. Technically, they are killing you, they say. But it seems they are not really doing that, sometimes. Perform a 10 > +- on that drugs effects and functions.
http://www.explosm.net/comics/476/
?
http://www.explosm.net/comics/180/
?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrrhic_victory
Yeah. I'd like my #B back. I never agreed to lose that. When did I? The many #N of Charlemagne? What 'probable' deals have been made by idiot or blockhead spirits without any true authority?
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment